Saturday, 20 June 2026

Why I Am Investing in Two Singapore Listed REITs Delivering More Than 8% Dividend Yield

UI Boustead REIT and Daiwa House Logistics Trust offer distribution yields above 8%, meaningfully higher than most Singapore blue-chip REITs such as Keppel REIT and CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, as well as traditional fixed income instruments. This places them at a clear income premium while still being backed by real asset cash flows.

Beyond yield, both trusts are anchored in logistics and industrial properties supported by long-term structural drivers including e-commerce growth, advanced manufacturing, and global supply chain reconfiguration. These are demand themes that continue to underpin occupancy and rental resilience across cycles.


UI Boustead REIT has a diversified portfolio of industrial, business park, and logistics assets primarily located in Singapore (about 70%+), with the remainder in Japan. Its tenant base is anchored by multinational corporations across engineering, life sciences, aerospace, and technology sectors, including names such as Rolls-Royce, Jabil, GSK, and Razer. This creates relatively stable occupancy supported by mission-critical industrial usage.

Daiwa House Logistics Trust (DHLT) focuses on modern logistics facilities, with the majority of assets located in Japan and a smaller portion in Vietnam. Its properties are strategically positioned near major transport corridors and consumption hubs. Tenants typically include e-commerce distributors, and warehouse users such as Suntory and Mitsubishi Express, providing long lease structures and stable cash flow visibility.

Geographically, the two REITs complement each other well: UI Boustead provides exposure to Singapore’s high-spec industrial and business park office for HQs, while DHLT offers pure-play exposure to Japan’s logistics market, which benefits from Japan's e-commerce, food and beverage products and automation tailwinds.

Investment View

For income investors, the core attraction is the exceptionally high and sustainable cash yield. With both REITs offering 8%+ distributions, investors are effectively locking in a materially higher income stream compared to most blue-chip REITs, government bonds, and fixed deposits. Importantly, this yield is backed by real assets, long lease tenures, and institutional-grade tenants rather than speculative growth assumptions. Combined with moderate leverage levels and strong sponsor backing, the pair provides a compelling balance of income stability and geographic diversification in today’s higher-rate environment.

4 comments:

  1. have you ever paused to think why the UI boustead reit yield is so high?

    some bare fundamental analysis would tell you that they are beefing up distributions to boost the IPO yield, and the 30% japan exposure would be an unmitigated disaster when the BOJ inevitably hike rates (they already hiked 25 bp this month).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi bb, could you elaborate on how they intend to increase distributions? The prospectus does not mention any sponsor-provided income support, so distributions appear to be fully rental-backed.

      While BOJ rate hikes may increase borrowing costs, UIB can mitigate this by refinancing more debt into SGD/SORA facilities. Currently, only about 54% of its loans are SGD-denominated, which could potentially be increased towards 70%, especially since Japan's risk-free rate is now only around 0.1% below Singapore's.

      In addition, built-in rental escalations of 2.8% should help offset any increase in interest expenses over time.

      Delete
    2. "One reason behind the higher yield is an IPO premium, where UI Boustead REIT is offering higher distributions to attract investors and compensate for shorter operating track records."

      source: https://www.dividendtitan.com/5-things-to-know-about-the-recent-ui-boustead-reit-ipo/

      my additional comments on jap portfolio:

      -Singapore occupancy is ~96%, while Japanese assets sit at ~76.7%, dragging the overall portfolio to 89.4%

      -The two Japan properties were at ~76–77% occupancy. The prospectus income projections assume occupancy ramps up substantially by FY2027. If that ramp doesn't materialise on schedule, the DPU was essentially being front-loaded against future rental income that hasn't been collected yet.

      -AUMOVIO Building Phase 3 will become vacant from 29 May 2026, with a 12-month downtime for AEI and lease-up. That's a 2026 DPU headwind.

      -Japanese commercial real estate is valued on cap rate compression logic. For years, the BOJ's near-zero rate environment drove investors into property because JGBs yielded nothing — that's what inflated Japanese industrial/logistics valuations in the first place. As the BOJ hikes toward and beyond 1%, two things happen simultaneously: Discount rates rise, compressing DCF-derived property values. JGBs become a credible alternative to real estate risk, pulling capital out of property and widening cap rates

      -Since UIBO is already trading at 0.95x P/NAV, any downward NAV restatement on the Japanese assets narrows that discount buffer or eliminates it entirely.

      Delete
    3. Hi BB,

      Dividendtitan wrote with no linkage that UI Boustead had juiced dividend up to attract IPO investors. Instead what Dividendtitan writes is that UI boustead had priced its REIT at the IPO price such that a high yield will mitigate its short operating record. The sponsor has not done any income support. Therefore, the 89.4% occupancy is supporting the current 8+% yield

      You are right that AUMVIO Building 3 will be vacant, however, my view is with rental uplift and backfilling, revenue for FY2027 will remain unchanged. Analyst are projecting DPU growth despite vacancy, however, I am more cautious and will state DPU remains unchanged at 8+% yield

      Japan Commerical Real Estate has already done cap rate compression 1 year back. Cap rate for Japan logistics is higher than Singapore's logistics. However, I would caveat risk free rate is only one factor towards computation of cap rate. Other factors include risk factors such as Social Cohesion and order, sub market trends which Singapore excels over Japan.

      Delete