Thursday 21 April 2016

What the humble "Bak chor mee" can teach us about investing



Let's talk about food! Had a bowl of bak chor mee for lunch at the canteen. Well it costs $3.50; let's be honest, it wasn't the tastiest bak chor mee in my lifetime but it did give me an epiphany which deserves a post.

You see, I have frequented this particular canteen and sometimes I will order the spaghetti bologanise for lunch, which costs $5.50. What struck me was how the time and effort to prepare both dishes are similar - put the noodles in hot water for a few mins, wring it dry, add the sauce (which has been prepared likely from a central kitchen) and its ready. And to me personally, both dishes cooked in this particular canteen provided the same level of satisfaction, "fullness" and the quantity of meat given was roughly the same. So why should I be paying $5.50 for one and $3.50 for the other when they are giving the same utility?

Prejudice

In a CNA interview, Dr Leslie Tay talked about the idea of culinary prejudice and how people tend to put foreign food on a higher stead than local food. How is this related to investing? 

Perhaps local investors have been putting blue chip names at a higher stead and this why the local stock market seems to ascribe a higher valuation (price point) to blue chip companies than their lesser well known counterparts; which means we may find smaller-cap stocks which are selling at a lower P/E or at a higher dividend yield to their well known counterparts of a similar industry. It is true that big names deserve a premium, however it is up to us as investors to question if such a wide price differential be warranted?

What are your thoughts? Have investing in lesser well known but well run companies been worth it?

3 comments:

  1. For food; the difference in Live to eat or Eat to live so that is the difference in the cost of food we are willing to pay.

    Long queue at food stall is either it is good or cheaper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are asking a very profound question. I guess there is evidence and statistics for both theories small caps outperforming the larger caps, or the other way around.
    Small caps do have operational advantages that their larger cap counterparts do not. Factors such as being thinly traded or not having many analysts cover the stock may act as a double-edged sword but, for the astute investor, these factors can actually present a great deal of opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup, if one thing we will ever learn in investing and that is no one single factor can explain the movement in a stock price. There will be different factors acting on a company's share price, ranging from the day's market sentiment to specific factors such as the company's exposure to a certain customer which its other customers might not be exposed to

      Delete