Business Times (Singapore) has published an opinion piece that choosing REITs over an investment home may be better
*Article requires subscription so might be hard to read in full.
Well as I had covered investing in REITs, REIT give much better returns than owning a property. I have done the maths here
In short, choosing the right REIT will yield good returns. In fact for my favourite REIT (United Hampshire US REIT), without leverage it is giving 8% dividend yield and on equity.
A Challenge to A Property Agent
I am willing to challenge an agent out there based on a condo project which has:
(i) more than 100 residential units in the project,
(ii) pricing based on latest URA pricing for condo sold (for capital gains),
(iii) rental income based on URA rental for a transaction in the condo project; and deducting (a) annual IRAS non owner occupied property tax rate from effective 1 Jan 2025 based on annual value=Rental multiply 12 months; (b) 0.5 months agent commission annually and (c) loan expense of 4% annual interest on the 50% leverage) based on a 50% cash/50% leverage model for the condo.
To give any property agent the advantage, I will not use a 50% cash/50% leverage model for Unitedhampshire US REIT (Phillips Securities provide loan of only 4.5% interest) but I am confident with this model, I will trash any property agent, hence I will make it nice and peg it to a 100% cash only model for buying United Hampshire US REIT (over a 5 year period), where UnitedHampshire US REIT purchased share price is 45.5 US cents based on today's pricing. Returns for Utdhampshire US REIT will be based on any capital gains + dividend over 05 years.
Time period: Ends on 31 Dec 2029
I am quite confident my pick of the REIT will surpass the returns of Singapore condo property